Skip to main content

The short answer

A fire risk assessment for an industrial or storage building examines three things together: the fire potential in the building — what is stored, in what quantity and in what manner; the characteristics of the building — compartment size, storage height, division into fire areas and escape routes; and the protection in place — detection, suppression, smoke control and manual means. The output is a graded risk and an account of the gaps, not a pass or a fail.

Who this applies to

Industrial and storage buildings, including logistics warehouses, production plants, laboratories and facilities storing flammable materials. A building that has changed use or increased its storage also warrants a fresh look.

What it means in practice

  • Fire load is calculated from the materials actually present and the compartment area — not estimated from the type of building.
  • How things are stored changes the picture as much as how much there is: height, density, racking and packaging all affect fire development.
  • Division into fire areas and escape routes are checked against the building as it stands today, including changes that were never documented.
  • Protection is judged not merely on being present but on being suited to the risk identified.
  • The result is an order of priority for remediation, which can be turned into a work plan and a budget.

What is usually needed

  • The compartment or building area, and a current drawing.
  • A list of the materials stored and their quantities.
  • Storage height and how material is actually stored.
  • Which fire safety systems are installed and the status of their testing.
  • Any changes made to the building since the last drawing.

Common mistakes

  • Skipping the fire load calculation and estimating "by building type". Two warehouses of the same size can be an order of magnitude apart.
  • Treating storage as a quantity alone, without height and without arrangement.
  • Assessing the building from an old drawing rather than from what is there.
  • Marking a system as "present" without checking that it suits the risk and is in date.
  • Ending at a grade with no order of priority — a grade without a plan is not a deliverable.

What this article does not settle

This article describes what an assessment covers; it is not an assessment. Grading the risk for a particular building requires a site visit and examination of the actual data.

The tool that continues from here

The Hoshen service

About this service

What this rests on

  • Fire Risk Assessment Procedure for Industrial and Storage BuildingsIsrael Fire and Rescue Authority — Fire Protection Division · נוהל אגף הגנה מאש
  • Definition of fire load and fire load densityPhysical definition — dimensional analysis · E = Σ(mᵢ × Hᵢ) ; q = E / A

Read against its sources on 22 August 2026

Need a professional review?

Get in touch and describe the specific situation in your organisation.

Contact us