Skip to main content

The short answer

The Hazardous Substances (Classification and Exemption) Regulations 1996 are built as an exemption with a carve-out: regulation 2 exempts dealing in certain substances in the quantities and on the conditions it sets, and regulation 3 removes from that exemption the cases it lists. A proper check therefore does not stop at identifying the substance: it asks whether the activity falls inside the exemption, and then whether any of regulation 3's carve-outs applies to it. The 2024 environmental licensing reform changed the framework for activities listed in its Third Schedule, while preserving the existing regime for activities that are not listed there.

Who this applies to

Anyone who holds, produces, transports, sells or uses substances classified as hazardous — plants, laboratories, logistics warehouses, print shops, garages and treatment facilities. Small quantities can also come into scope, because the carve-outs are not only quantitative.

What it means in practice

  • The exemption is not a default: it applies only to what the regulations define, in the quantities and on the conditions they define.
  • Regulation 3 can bring back a permit obligation for an activity that looks exempt under regulation 2. This is the provision most businesses miss.
  • The 2024 reform does not sweep the previous regime away — it replaces it for activities listed in the Third Schedule and preserves it for the rest.
  • A substance's classification follows its safety data sheet and its official classification, not its trade name.
  • A check finding that these particular regulations do not bring you into a permit obligation does not establish that no other obligation applies — business licensing, environmental protection, fire safety and contractual undertakings are separate regimes.

What is usually needed

  • The actual list of substances, with official name and classification — not trade names alone.
  • Current safety data sheets (SDS) for every substance.
  • The maximum quantities held at any one time, rather than annual consumption.
  • A description of the activity: holding, producing, using, storing or transporting — each means something different.
  • Site details and the storage conditions as they actually are.

Common mistakes

  • Reading regulation 2 and stopping. The exemption is read together with its carve-out, or the answer comes out backwards.
  • Calculating from annual consumption instead of the quantity held at one time.
  • Relying on a substance's trade name instead of the classification on its safety data sheet.
  • Assuming the 2024 reform removed the need. For some activities it changed nothing.
  • Reading "no obligation was found within this check" as "there is no obligation".

What this article does not settle

This article explains the structure of the arrangement. It does not determine whether a particular business requires a permit; that depends on the substances, the quantities, the storage conditions and the nature of the activity, and is settled with the competent authority.

The tool that continues from here

The Hoshen service

About this service

What this rests on

  • תקנות החומרים המסוכנים (סיווג ופטור), התשנ״ו-1996מדינת ישראל — המשרד להגנת הסביבה · ק״ת 5762, עמ' 1035 · תקנות 1–3; התוספת הראשונה; התוספת השנייה
  • חוק הגנת הסביבה (ייעול הליכי רישוי סביבתי) (תיקוני חקיקה), התשפ״ד-2024, וצווי הדחייה מ-2026מדינת ישראל · ס״ח 3208, עמ' 798; ק״ת 12481, עמ' 2448–2449 · ס' 6 (תחילה); ס' 18–25 (הוראות מעבר); התוספת השלישית חלק א' וחלק ב'; התוספת הרביעית והחמישית

Read against its sources on 22 August 2026

Need a professional review?

Get in touch and describe the specific situation in your organisation.

Contact us